So where is the White House on muslim protests?

Very interesting. We've heard several stories now from Jay Carneybarker at the White House, and whoever that woman with the bad hair is at the State Department regarding the uprising of muslim terrorisrs all around the world.

First it was because of that stupid film clip that suggested Mohammed was less than saintly. "It's all his fault. Go arrest him."

So they got the guy in detention, but aparently there wren't really any grounds for his arrest. He sucks as a film-maker, but if that was a crimial offense, surely Michael Moore would be in San Quentin.

And Susan "Don't have a clue" Rice, US Ambassador to the UN and a long-time cohort of our illustrious Comrade, went on severl big talk shows and announced that the whole mess in the Egypt and all was just a "spontaneous" outbreak of hatred for America and American free speech -- due to that stupid film clip.

Interesting how John McCain was the first to ponder, "How many people show up at a protest with rocket-propelled grenades and other heavy weapons?" Good question. Glad someone in Washington noticed that. Maybe because McCain has a military background.

In addition, polls that were taken very qucikly determined that about 75% of US citizens would rather go to war with the muslim world than surrender their right to free speech.

So the idea of censorship went nowhere.

And then it became clear -- from the mouth of the Presdient of Libya, no less -- that those psychos who killed the US Ambassador in Benghazi were terrorists. The incident was a terrorist attack, not a protest, that president said.

So then, and still, the rest of the muslim world is going up in flames. People in gunny sacks jumping up and down in front of US, German, Swiss, and French embassies like bunch of monkeys, screaming, throwing things. Looks like an asylum for the crimially insane. I guess it is.

And so then yesterday, Jay Carneybarker announced that the attack on the Libyan consulate, where Chris Stevens and three others were killed is "self-evidently" a terrorist attack.

Maybe self-evident to most Americans for a week or more, but apparently that just dawned on the White House.

And I suppose somehow, it'll end up that it's all George Bush's fault. Or Mitt Romney's.

And where the hell is the US President? I think the Comrade made a casual mention in some radio address that the Middle East is in flames and a million crazed muslims are coming to get us. But he deson't seem very concerned about it,. No, it's much more important to him to go out and slander Romney and Ryan.

Somebody's values and priorities are totally screwed up, do ya think?

On a positive note, Donald Reaqgan, Ronald Reagan's son, was on Megyn Kelly's show today and suggested that since the Comrade is apparently AWOL -- lost his way on the campaign trail and may be wandering through Death Valley, looking for the tracks of his bus in the sand -- that perhaps someone like Mitt Romney should stand up and simply take over the role of Leader of the Free World. At least to comfort and reassure American citizens that we'll survive.

I'd like that. I'd llike to have someone in the White House who gives a shit. We haven't enjoyed that for quite some time now.

Save the Republic.

Make my day... release the blind sheikh

Laughing so hard right now I have coffee shooting out my nose. I just saw the latest ad from the DNC, claiming Mitt Romney is conducting class warfare.

The dems are such major league liars and hypocrites it just boggles the mind.

On that note, the State Department -- who are in charge of foreign affairs -- just announced that they have no plans to release the blind sheikh. I'm not sure what his name is, I'm guessing something like Al-qill-all.

At any rate, the blind sheikh was the "brains" behind the first, failed bombing of the World Trade Center. Remember the truck bomb that went off in the basement, doing almost nothing to the rest of the building? Anyway, he's serving a life sentence in the USA for that,.

If you've been looking at the signs the loonie muslim terrorists are waving in front of the cameras in front the US Embassy in Egypt, you may have noticed that a number of them are in English and are demanding the release of the blind sheikh.

Apparently notices were posted around Sept. 9 on the Internet that all mad-dog loonie muslim terrorists strap on their skates and protest the US Embassy in Egypt on 9/11. Reportedly, the posts suggest these mad-dog muslims burn down the Embassy if necessary. Necessary for what, I don't know.

Also, blind sheikh supporters wear Santa Claus hats. You can identify them that way. Although I really don't know what's up with that.

The State Department says they aren't considering releasing the sheikh, and that they've received nothing from any "senior" Egyptians making such demands.

But we know they lie. They've done nothing but lie since the first hysterical muslim, foaming at the mouth and shouting bloodthirsty curses, appeared in front of the US Embassy.

You know what, though? I hope this stupid White House does order the sheikh's release.

Then for sure the butt-kissing incompetent who sucks up the perks belonging to the Office of the US President will most deinitely lose the election. And henceforth, he may find it more convenient to live in Uganda or Sudan or some muslim armpit nation instead of trying to return to anyplace in the USA. Seems he'd be more comfortable in the 3rd or 4th world anyway, among other crazies and marxists. Maybe he could organize them.

And ol' Hillary, Secretary of State and another follower of the infamous Saul Alinsky (of Rules for Radicals fame) won't dare show her face as a candidate in 2016. We could get rid of the whole lot of them.

Save the Republic.

Hey, Mitt, don't apologize for the truth

Late last night I heard the audio of a Mitt Romney fundraiser -- or it seemed to be -- that was leaked by Mother Jones. It was on Huffington Post, without the video, only the sound.

Of course, Huffington Post made a big deal out of it. "Ooooh, kids, what will the government dependents say?"

Who cares? They're probably voting for the Comrade anyway. Just like those union members who march in lockstep with their leaders. They're "jobs" or shall we say "incomes" depend on supporting -- by votes, mind you, because they depend on the governtment for everything else -- a massive nanny state. These are people who gave up the First Freedom -- freedom to make your own decisions -- a long time ago. They'd rather ponder their victimhood rather than act to free themselves from it.

What ticks me off is that so many people who call themselves "conservative" accept the lamestream media's interpretation of Romney's words. They go, like the socialists, "Ooooooh kids, the underclass won't like it." Saw Bill O'Reilly doing this tonight his show, and certainly he should know better.

Who gives a damn? The underclass gets a solid percentage of all of our incomes. Isn't that enough? Do we have to be polite to them, too? If the truth hurts their hopeless little hearts, so be it.

But admittedly, in many cases, and especially because we are all burdened with Obamonomics and a disappearing economy, the poor aren't solely responsible for their poverty. Looking at the non-improving unemployment statistics, I would guess many people who live on government checks today were doing pretty well for themselves four or five years ago. They can't find jobs. They can't find jobs largely because of the Comrade's stupid policies.

If they're smart and truly want get off the government dole, they'll vote for Romney.

The rest? Who gives a damn? If they summon enough energy to vote at all, they'll vote for the socialist.

And funny, too, I've read many comments from those who note their responses at the end of news articles. Many of them want -- very much -- to see Romney take off the gloves. They like it when he's not so nice.

I do too.

Save the Republic.

Muslims gone wild

I'm getting a little sick of these psychopaths in the Middle East.

Their countries are shit-holes. Egypt hasn't been "glorious" for 4,000 years. The rest of them live on the money they make selling crude to Europe and America and begged aid for their useless selves. Westerners don't want to see them starve -- though at this point, that looks like an appealing alternative.

Useless and destructive as they are, like adolescents unable to control their immediate impulses, they think they deserver some kind of special privileged treatment.

Don't any of them work? I mean, where to they get the time to tantrum so relentlessly?

Today is apparently something of a sabbath for them. So they go out and burn things, throw stones and anything else they can carry, and kill as many people as they can. So this must be the muslim definition of "worship."

Any question about why these countries don't even qualify for "third world" status? Try "shit-hole world."

Could it be because they have no human values, and not the respect for life that dogs have?

What a bunch of psychopaths. Only one way to deal with those who deliberately suppress their human capacity to reason, preferring to run like crazed lemings through the streets. You can't live with them. They won't let you. Like a crazy dog at the end of the street whose owner won't pen him up.

All they have are excuses. All they do is blame everyone else for their continuous failure at just about evertyhing. Whine, cry, feel sorry for their sorry useless selves and pointless, hopeless lives.

No wonder the Comrade has a soft spot in his head for them. Birds of a feather.

Save the Republic.

Forget Bush, it's all Romney's fault

Give me a break.

After being attacked by barking-mad mulsim terrorists a couple days ago, the U.S. Embassy in Cairo issued a statement that went something like, "Gee, I'm sorry. Can I destroy the U.S. Consitution to assuage your silly sensitivities?" Or like that.

Mitt Romney then issued a statement calling the event -- and especially the Embassy's response -- a disgrace.

The Comrade was at a fundraiser or something. He probably didn't know anything about the Egypt and Libya situation until he heard about it from a pizza maker in St. Louis while ordering a pie.

Anyway, hours after Romney's statement, the Comrade apparently turned on the TV and realized that the Mideast was blowing up, with foaming-at-the-mouth lunatics trying to murder our State Dept. representatives. Very disquieting, huh?

He was apparently more pissed off that Romney spoke up about it first.

So after a quick check of the polls and maybe a glance at international laws and traditions regarding diplomatic protocols -- and after the Libyans murdered Chistopher Stephens and his staff -- the Comrade decided to scold the Egyptian Embassy for kissing butt, and "strongly condemned" the murder of U.S. officials doing state business overseas.

Yeah, it is sort of bothersome, isn't it? When you're trying to get re-elected as a The Man Who Shot Osama Bn Laden.

And the Comrade noted that Mitt Romney "shot from the hip," issuing his statement before the Comrade had the spare time to break away from rabble-rousing to attend to U.S. foreign policy.

Interesting, isn't it, that the Comrade AGREED with Romney? And yet Romney was in the wrong?

Looks very, very much like the Comrade was totally at a loss for any response, saw Romney's statement, and then went, "Yeah. Me, too." Of course, the Comrade has to take credit for it -- so he demonizes Romney.

Leading from behind again, eh, Comrade? Hillary Clinton showed more backbone than the Comrade.

Well, we've witnessed this kind of B.S. for the last four years now. We know the Comrade now as the incompetent narcissist that he truly is. Even though the lamestream media is all atwitter about Romney upstaging the Comrade. I'm sure that, like the White House, NBC is much more upset about how this disaster -- a remake of the Carter administration -- will impact the elections than they are about the deaths of US consuls and even the perils of this current international turmoil.

Thank God for Romney. Has it ever been clearer that we need someone with a functioning brain and a true reverence for the USA in the White House?

Save the Republic.

Identifying "The Great Satan"

Well, the body count -- so far -- is in.

The muslim wingnuts in Libya killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stephens and three of his staff. Don't quite know why. Many people question whether or not the cause was that stupid movie clip, because some reports claim that the riots, the attacks on the consulates, all of it, was planned ahead of time to coordinate with 9/11.

OK... so I'm not religious at all. I believe in life and human development and achievement. I don't have a horse in this particular race, or not a muslim, Christian or Jewish horse specifically.

However... would any sort of viable and useful and respectable God preach hatred, death, war, suicide, violence? Would He -- or She -- send his or her children into the streets to murder other people, and on as large a scale as possible, with no regard whatsoever for the value of life? Apparently with no purpose whatsoever, except to advance death, destruction, ignorance and poverty.

The larger question might well be -- what kind of nutso freak would worship such a demon and enact his will?

So I think we can clearly identify exactly who the Great Satan really is -- or are -- and he/they has nothing to do with Abraham, Solomon or Jesus. No, the Great Satan is some kind of looney-toons psychopath who lives just outside Israel's borders in the Middle East.

And where the hell is our Comrade? Golf? Basketball? Hey, Comrade, how about another tour of the Middle East? Think you'd survive? I bet you don't have the guts to even try it.

So, once again, how's that hope and change thing workin' for ya?

Save the Republic.

9/11 + 11 the movie -- the caliphate strikes back

Yesterday was the 11th anniversary of the attacks on New York's World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and wherever Flight 93 was headed before its doomed passengers counterattacked the plane's hijackers.

There were the usual tributes and memorials. And New York and DC, everyone says, enjoyed bright, clear skies and moderate temperatures -- just like on 9/11/01.

Too sad.

And on what is a day of mourning for the USA, the burgeoning muslim caliphate in the Mediterranean went on some kind of blockheaded rampage, storming the walls of US consulates in Egypt and Libya. They tore down and burned the US flag in Egypt, generating a wimp-like apology for America's religious tolerance from the State Dept's chargez-des-morons there. In Libya, an American was killed by a mob roaming the streets like a pack of rabid dogs. Just the same old same old for muslim nations.

Why? They claim it's because of a movie made in the USA that portrays Mohammed in a bad light.

I stalked YouTube and another visitor announced that the trailer for the anti-Mohammed movie was available at LiveLeak. So trekked over there.

If the 12-minute clip at LiveLeak is the movie the Egyptians and Libyans are so hysterical about -- what a bunch of loonies. The movie -- or at least the clip -- stinks very badly.

First of all, it's kind of funny in the way it pastes the live action over what appears to be  various photographs of the desert. The characters walk around and leave no footprints in the sand. What I assume is supposed to be an "armored vehicle" in one scene looks like a cardboard replica of the Nazi Volkswagen Beetle. The people wear very strange head gear, reminiscent of the "doo rags" blacks used to wear sometimes when they were trying to straighten their hair. (No longer cool, unless you're First Lady.)

The dialog apparently was written so that even -- or only -- an 8-year-old could understand it. And Mohammed directs several cohorts who, in any other film, could only be regarded as comic relief. Mohmammed himself doesn't do much but drool at the sight of big-breasted women and allow himself, but no one else, to take liberties with them.

The movie would be insulting except that it's so silly. Which is why I still harbor doubts about whether or not that thing at LiveLeak is THE movie that got the caliphate's panties in such a twist. The clip is ridiculous. Certainly not worth killing over. Perhaps only the muslims could take it seriously. The movie's so bad it's laughable.

But I've heard about some of the movies Iran's Abracadabrajab has produced, and perhaps even written, about how there was no Holocaust in World War II, etc etc. Those are equally as much as crap as the anti-Mohammed one, though with better production values. Yet I don't recall any westerners, not even Israelis or Holocaust survivors -- taking to the streets like extras in a Frankenstein movie and burning Iranian flags.

The caliphate just isn't civilized. They need to learn Lesson #1 about living in the world with other people. That is -- tolerance. We put up with your crap, you put up with ours.

The alternative is you blow up our cities, we blow up yours. Is that preferable?

Save the Republic.