It's becoming unbearable to hear the Comrade speak. I just can't stand the sight or sound of him anymore. I went through something similar with a few other dem prezes, most notably Jimmy Carter. The nation was going to hell in a handbasket, and Carter just wanted to hold everyone's hand and thought if he smiled big enough, we'd all get over our "malaise."
Oh well, that's over now.
Now we've got Comrade Spin. He's actually insulting. Snippets of his interview with Stephanopolous appear on TV. The Comrade says he didn't run for office to fix the economy. So exactly why did he run for office?
Think he's tipping his hand? Clearly, he has a marxist agenda. Many people claim he ran as a centrist in the campaign. Funny, though, I always believed he was at least a socialist. That's what the rhetoric sounded like to me. But then a lot of people talk socialism and don't realize it's socialism. It's just something they picked up in an Ivy League poli-sci class and they think it sounds appropriately socially concerned and informed. It isn't, but they don't know that; they haven't been exposed to any other, more enlightened views.
But I digress. What I mean to say is... If the Comrade didn't run for office to be a president and to govern, then why the hell did he run for office?
Apparently to promote his communist ideas.
I believe he's a totally committed ideological marxist. Not even the pragmatic variety, but a real purist marxist.
He doesn't seem to care anything about the USA. He just wants to push his marxist agenda. He doesn't care if the debt is $14 TRILLION. In fact, all the better for him -- it will hasten the demise of capitalism in the USA.
He doesn't care if people are working or not, whether or not they can pay their mortgages, and on and on and on.
His sole purpose is to establish communist policies.
Of course, marxists -- real, true marxists (that is to say, "blind-to-reality" marxists) -- don't understand that marxism is inherently and necessarily totalitarian. They believe that it can be "democratic." But their definition of "democratic" may vary from the popular interpretation.
In the Athenian democracy of ancient times, when the citizens elected a leader, that leader had absolute power. One of the Athenian leaders was Tyro. That's where the word "tyrant" comes from. This seems to be the Comrade's view of democracy. However, because of the US Constitution, no elected official in the USA can be granted that much power. Citizens and congress and even the Supreme Court can try to give him that much power -- likely to be challenged successfully because such a concentration of power violates the Constitution. The Constitution simply does not allow it.
The USA is "democratic" in the sense that majority rules for some things, but it's not a democracy. Never has been. It's built on the concept of individual rights, not mob rule.
With Scott Brown elected in Taxachusetts, the dems in congress now seem to be waking up a bit and getting reluctant to continue to hand over their own power by marching in lock-step to support the Comrade's agenda. Seems they're just discovering, "Hey, we don't have to go along with this...."
They never had to go along with the Comrade. I can't imagine why they do. Is Pazzo going to refuse to donate to their campaign funds or what? The Legislative Branch has just as much power at the Executive Branch. Congress can tell the Comrade to blow it out his ear. And they appear to be mvoing in that direction, however slowly.
So now Comrade Spin is going around telling people, like in Ohio the other day, that all their problems are somehow related to Wall Street financiers getting bonsuses.
Trying to stir up class warfare. It's pure marxist. It's also pure bullshit in the USA. That's not going anywhere. In their heart of hearts, most Americans would love to make millions of dollars every year. They may be envious of others who do, but not so envious that they would give up their own opportunity to make millions. They understand that if the execs at AIG have to give up their bonuses, the government can make the guy working the loading dock at WalMart give up his bonuses, too -- or any chance of any bonus.
And guess what? This crap isn't playing well. The audience tends to push the class warfare jazz to one side and ask, "But what are you doing to do to restart the economy?"
Comrade Spin doesn't want to do anything about the economy. He wants to see it collapse so that he can replace it with a totalitarian structure.... no doubt as an "emergency measure." Like the goddamn stimulus bill. That piece of crap may have already wrecked any hope of economic recovery. But it can still be repealed.
Comrade Spin tells citizens they're angry because the "special interests" are defeating socialized medicine. No, Comrade, we all know that the "special interests" -- including the unions -- are all lined up on your side. You've bought them all off. And that is something we did get to watch on TV, such as senate whore Landrieu crowing about getting $300 million, not a measly $100 million. We all know this. He isn't fooling anyone.
Does he really think that we don't know why we're angry? Does he really think that we're going to accept his interpretation of our own feelings and attitudes above our own judgment?
Comrade Spin has got to be one of the most arrogant individuals on the planet. He's telling us that he knows better than we do what's in our own hearts and minds? He really does believe he's omnipotent, doesn't he? That's dangerously sociopathic.
Comrade Spin is an idiot, and worse than that -- he's a one-trick pony. He can't fix the economy, he can't govern this nation. He doesn't have the experience, he doesn't have the information, and he refuses to do anything to improve himself. Improve himself? My God, he's already close to perfect, isn't he? He won't even look at reality. He doesn't care about reality. He didn't run for office to govern the USA. He ran for office to establish socialism here. He's not even going to try to do anything else.
We'll see how that works for you, Comrade.
No comments:
Post a Comment