Some interests more "special" than others?

So the Comrade has been flying around trying to whip up enthusiasm for socialism and wage slavery. Yeah, that could happen, but I wouldn't hold my breath. And if it was me, I wouldn't call Pazzo Pelosi "the greatest Speaker of the House" and expect to win any friends or influence people.

It's come to my attention via all the dust the Comrade and his minions kicked up about the US Chamber of Commerce supposedly using "funds from foreign sources" as campaign donations, that the Comrade and his merry marxists have raised even more money from unions -- and many of them proudly claim to be "global." Interesting that AFSCME, the union representing state, county and municipal employees, is the Comrade's and the dems' largest donor. Follwed by SEIU and several other unions. All unions.

Yet unions represent only 7% or less of employees at privately-owned businesses. By contrast, 74% of of government employees are union members.

And the Comrade crows about "special interests."  That's kinda funny. People who work for, I don't know, let's say, Verizon or who own their own business are "special interests," but union members, who are largely government workers, aren't "special interests." I mean, it's not like the general American public are primarily government workers in a union, know what I mean? Unionized government workers seem like a pretty clearly defined and exclusive little "special interest" group, dontcha think?

And here's another question:  While the Comrade is wandering around the country in a thong and halter top, waving pompoms, cheerleading his "non-special interest" groups, at least trying to inspire them to drag their sorry dependent asses to the polling place next Tuesday... Who's minding the store?

'Course it's not like the Comrade ever really liked making any decisions. He has his little agenda written in tiny little letters on the cuff of his shirts, and he doesn't consider anything else and doesn't like to have to think about anything else. He doesn't make decisions. He follows the marxist line. He knows how to campaign, but he doesn't know how to govern.

So I guess that leaves him plenty of free time to go out and jump up and down and make a lot of ludicrous accusations about private citizens. He's looking pretty desperate.

But who's taking care of things in the White House? Robert Gibbs? Everyone else has resigned.

Good God, Save the Republic.