Well, hate to say I toldya so, but in my Nov. 2 blog, titled "White House Game Plan," I outlined pretty damn accurately the Comrade's and the left's program for the future of the USA.
And now in the Dec. 1 Wall Street Journal, Andy Stern -- former head of the SEIU, currently a professor at Columbia, and one of the Comrade's love-bugs -- has suggested that since Red China is so far ahead of the USA economically (in their dreams, anyway), we should probably adopt Red China's economic model. Central planning, centralized control, government-owned and operated.
Read it here if you don't believe me:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204630904577056490023451980.html?KEYWORDS=China%27s+Superior+Economic+MOdel
See? What did I say? They create a huge mess, force a deadlock in congress, sieze control of and paralyze key components of the US economy like the banks, and use the EPA and Dept of Energy to hamstring free enterprise here --and then suggest:
HEY, THINGS ARE SUCH A MUDDLE, AREN'T THEY? WOULDN'T YOU JUST PREFER TO BE A SLAVE TO THE STATE? DON'T YOU REALLY, DEEP IN YOUR HEART, LONG TO LIVE UNDER A TOTALITARIAN DCTATORSHIP? (WITH THE LIKES OF STERN RUNNING THINGS, OF COURSE.)
Stern has balls, I got to say that.
I mean, it's not like anything the left has suggested has worked so far. So Stern suggests we demand more of it? He really thinks we're stupid. The SEIU is mostly unskilled and unschooled labor, dude. They run ads on Craigslist for paid protesters (read "Astro-Turf") for $10.00 an hour. Not exactly representative of the rest of the labor force. In fact, only a very tiny percentage.
The fact that Stern is actually employed at Columbia University doesn't say much for the Ivy League, either. Or actually it says a whole lot about the Ivy League, doesn't it?
Hey, Mr. Shit-for-brains Stern, we already have about three-quarters of the communist model and what is the result so far?
Got to ask: Are you better off now than you were three years ago?
Somehow I can't see how this economic mess is the result of free market capitalism, rather, just the opposite. It's the result of nanny-statism, over-regulation, illiterate political idiots running the US Senate, and a total incompetent blockhead in the White House. And I'm being kind; actually, I think the Comrade is a very shrewd sociopath -- a really mean and power-hungry bastard -- like Stern and all the other totalitarians who have preceded them.
You know what? I'm proud of myself. I'm almost never wrong about politics, you know. And I called this one.
And why, oh why, is the media -- with a few exceptions -- along with conservative politicians, so slow to call out these marxists? I mean call them "marxists." These creeps even admit it.
And what an inopportune moment for Stern to come out of the closet -- when everybody hates the Comrade, the economy's in the dumper due to his policies, and Stern's loyalists -- the OWies -- are proving themselves to be ignorant and even criminal slobs and mental defectives. I mean, does Stern think he's got a shot here? Exactly what does he have to offer?
Perhaps he's been too long at Columbia.
Save the Republic.
No comments:
Post a Comment