What??

That Fluke person (forgot her first name) is right now rerunning through her speech. I'm looking at the clips and reports because I'm quite sure I couldn't tolerate sitting through the whole thing.

At any rate, so Fluke is talking about  a man who was verbally assaulted, etc etc. in some disgraceful attack. I honestly thought she was talking about Mitt Romney at first, then it struck me -- no, that ain't no way possible.

She's quite bitter (over what??), and not a very good speaker. Apparently she can say only two words before taking a breath. From what I saw of her, she's not making much sense. Could be because I couldn't possibly sit through the whole context. (Or wade through it.)

I'm curious though -- is it really "political oppression" for women to pay for their own birth control pills?

I don't know. I find that rather laughable -- or even terribly pathetic, coming from spoiled American princesses who consider a bad hair day "oppressive." Or an inadequate selection of shoes.

When women are being stoned in some parts of the world for going outside alone, or for showing their faces. A part of the world that the Comrade, by the way, seems to favor. What does that say about him? He doesn't seem to want to help. He's all enrapt with the sound of eveing prayers from the minaret.

Oh jeez... Elizabeth Warren on now. You know, I have exactly as much Cherokee blood as she does. I have a grandmother -- or great-grand -- who was full-blooded Cherokee and married a Canadian who'd come over to the US about the middle of the 1800s. We had an old tintype of her in the family album, with the latest generation forever asking, "So who's the Indian?"

Yet it never occurred to me to make an appeal for "privileged" status. Hell, maybe I'll open a casino or something, now that I see I can qualify.

I didn't see any of Clinton's speech, except for a tiny bit in clips, where he was waving his arms around, trying to look like he really means it. I may watch more of it. On the other hand, he's such a jerk, I can't imagine finding value in anything he says.

Clinton, actually, is a terible speaker. He always has been. And apparently he rambled on for an hour or more tonight, putting people to sleep, even his fans.

I'm not one of his fans. I truly believe he's something of a sociopath, and he is definitely a documented liar. I don't know why or how anyone can mistake him for some kind of credible or even remotely respectable person. Apparently dem insiders regard him as "The Big Dog." 'Cause he tries to hump everyone?

And Clinton -- or those around him, including people at Fox -- seem to believe that he fashioned a successful economy. Perhaps they're too young to remember how he actually began to shut down the federal government when presented with balanced budget legislation crafted by the Contract for American people -- led by Newt Gingrich. People were turned away from the national parks because old Big Dog was shutting down all the real esential stuff -- not the White House, unfortunately.

As I recall, they had to drag Clintoin kicking and screaming into rational spending.

I give  him NO credit for that at all. All he did was recognize which way the wind was blowing. Probably what he does best.

Enough.

Save the Republic.